Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

UG

U.S. GOLD CORP. (USAU)·Q2 2015 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Revenue was $6.88M, down 7.1% year over year from $7.41M and down sequentially from $7.73M; net loss widened to $1.507M (−$0.63 EPS) vs. −$0.18 EPS a year ago as interest and operating losses weighed on results .
  • Results included $0.617M of non‑cash interest expense from amortization of debt discount, intensifying the quarterly loss .
  • Liquidity and equity improved post‑quarter via a $2.7M sale of Series A Preferred Stock (put/call up to an additional 700k shares), enabling NASDAQ compliance to be regained and closed by NASDAQ’s listing review panel—key stock reaction catalysts .
  • No formal financial guidance (revenue/EPS/margins) was provided in the quarter’s materials .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Closed capital raise: “We are pleased to have completed this capital raise which enables Dataram to grow and continue to be competitive in the marketplace.” — John H. Freeman, CEO .
  • Additional liquidity access: “With the $2,700,000 raise and the ability to draw on an additional approximately $3,500,000 of working capital… the Company is positioned to fund future customer orders…” — John H. Freeman .
  • NASDAQ compliance regained; securities continue to trade on NASDAQ Capital Market, closing the listing review—reducing near‑term listing risk .

What Went Wrong

  • Top line softness and margin pressure: Q2 revenue fell to $6.88M vs. $7.41M YoY and $7.73M in Q1, consistent with prior commentary on 13% industry‑wide decline in material cost per GB driving lower ASPs .
  • Losses widened: net loss was −$1.507M vs. −$0.338M YoY, with operating loss −$0.811M and other expense −$0.696M (including $0.617M non‑cash interest amortization) .
  • Tight liquidity at quarter‑end: cash was $0.033M, equity fell to $0.478M, and accounts payable rose to $2.249M, highlighting balance sheet strain prior to the preferred financing .

Financial Results

Income Statement trend (oldest → newest)

MetricQ2 2014 (Oct 31, 2013)Q1 2015 (Jul 31, 2014)Q2 2015 (Oct 31, 2014)
Revenue ($USD Millions)$7.410 $7.725 $6.880
Cost of Sales ($USD Millions)$5.841 $6.476 $5.872
Loss from Operations ($USD Millions)−$0.258 −$0.561 −$0.811
Other (Expense) ($USD Millions)−$0.080 −$0.196 −$0.696
Net Loss ($USD Millions)−$0.338 −$0.760 −$1.507
Basic/Diluted EPS ($USD)−$0.18 −$0.32 −$0.63
Weighted Avg Shares (000s)1,899 2,411 2,411

Q2 2015 actual vs. consensus

MetricQ2 2015 ActualQ2 2015 ConsensusSurprise
Revenue ($USD Millions)$6.880 Unavailable (S&P Global)N/A
Primary EPS ($USD)−$0.63 Unavailable (S&P Global)N/A

Note: Consensus estimates were unavailable from S&P Global at the time of request; comparisons to Wall Street consensus cannot be assessed.

Segment breakdown

ItemDetail
Business SegmentCompany operates in one segment (memory products) .
Geography (Q1 2015)United States $6.631M; Europe $0.939M; Other $0.156M .

KPIs and liquidity (balance sheet)

Metric ($USD Millions)Apr 30, 2014Jul 31, 2014Oct 31, 2014
Cash & Cash Equivalents$0.258 $0.135 $0.033
Accounts Receivable (net)$3.663 $3.315 $2.961
Inventories$2.291 $2.021 $2.072
Note Payable – Revolving Credit$2.970 $2.424 $2.616
Accounts Payable$1.438 $1.479 $2.249
Stockholders’ Equity$1.985 $1.980 $0.478

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Financial Guidance (Revenue/EPS/Margins)Q2 2015None disclosed None disclosed Maintained (no formal guidance)
Listing Compliance PlanFY 2015At risk of non‑compliance; plan to sell preferred Closed $2.7M Series A Preferred; NASDAQ compliance regained Improved

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 2015 and prior)Current Period (Q2 2015)Trend
Liquidity/CapitalEntered $750k subordinated convertible bridge notes; planned Series A Preferred to regain NASDAQ compliance Closed $2.7M Series A Preferred; put/call up to 700k additional shares; compliance regained Improving access to capital; listing risk reduced
Pricing/Macro13% industry‑wide decline in material cost per GB pressured ASPs YoY revenue down; cost of sales elevated; margins pressured Ongoing margin headwind
Product/SoftwareTechnological feasibility established; $0.142M dev costs capitalized (Intelligent Caching Software) Continued development with $0.223M capitalized in Q2 Continued execution on software initiative
Governance/BoardNew directors elected alongside financing Governance refreshed
NASDAQ ListingNotified by NASDAQ of deficiency; sought hearing NASDAQ confirms compliance and closes review Resolved risk

Note: No Q2 2015 earnings call transcript was available; themes reflect press releases and filings search coverage [ListDocuments results showed no transcript for the period].

Management Commentary

  • “We are pleased to have completed this capital raise which enables Dataram to grow and continue to be competitive in the marketplace.” — John H. Freeman, CEO .
  • “With the $2,700,000 raise and the ability to draw on an additional approximately $3,500,000 of working capital and the expense cutting actions… the Company is positioned to fund future customer orders…” — John H. Freeman .
  • On NASDAQ: “We are glad to have this behind us and with the proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred we expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future.” — John Freeman, CEO .
  • On Q1 macro backdrop: “The primary factor impacting our financial results was a 13% industry wide decline in material cost per gigabyte… Despite these industry wide challenges, we continue to see signs of revenue growth through our new partnerships…” — John H. Freeman .

Q&A Highlights

  • No Q2 2015 earnings call transcript or Q&A was found for USAU/Dataram in the period. Searched SEC/press archives and transcripts; none available [ListDocuments showed 0 earnings-call-transcript for 2014–2015].

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus for Q2 2015 revenue and EPS was unavailable at the time of request due to data access limits; as a result, beat/miss vs. Street cannot be assessed here. Values would normally be retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Liquidity improved post‑quarter via $2.7M preferred financing and access to an additional $3.5M revolver capacity, reducing near‑term listing and funding risk .
  • Despite financing, operational cash remained tight at quarter‑end (cash $0.033M; equity $0.478M), underscoring urgency to stabilize margins and working capital .
  • Top‑line pressure and gross margin headwinds persisted, consistent with industry ASP declines; watch for pricing stabilization and mix improvements to lift operating leverage .
  • Non‑cash interest expense from debt discount amortization ($0.617M) significantly impacted the quarter; as financing terms normalize, reported losses should better reflect core operations .
  • Continued investment in Intelligent Caching Software (capitalized dev costs) could diversify revenue/margin profile if commercialization scales; monitor product milestones and opex discipline .
  • Governance refresh and NASDAQ compliance removal of overhang can catalyze sentiment; further tranches of preferred (up to 700k shares) represent dilution/financing path—track execution pace and use of proceeds .
  • Near‑term trading implications: sensitivity to liquidity headlines and any signs of margin stabilization; medium‑term thesis depends on sustained revenue growth, improved cost structure, and successful software initiative rollout .

Citations: